之前的挪亞電影已經讓我對好萊屋拍攝所謂的「聖經故事」有所卻步，今天卻來個更嗆的評論－－主演黑暗騎士等蝙蝠俠系列電影，Christian Bale，說 我想摩西應該是一個精神分裂患者，是我這一輩子看過最野蠻的人其中之一。 （I think the man was likely schizophrenic and was one of the most barbaric individuals that I ever read about in my life.） 新聞來源： http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/christian-bale-calls-moses-barbaric-743874 我希望教會不要看到電影名稱就叫大家帶人去看這部電影，看到Christ Bale的評論，對於這部電影能夠傳達什麼訊息，我沒有信心。另外，這部電影的導演Ridley Scott在Entertainment Weekly訪談裡說到，不是摩西也不是上帝開了紅海，它是因為地震的緣故。 新聞來源： http://insidemovies.ew.com/2014/10/23/ridley-scott-red-sea-exodus/ 除非有免費的票，我絕對不會去看這部電影。對於Christian Bale對於摩西的評論，我很好奇的想：如果他覺得摩西是個野蠻人，那他對於穆罕默德，這位伊斯蘭信仰的創立者，能夠有什麼樣的看法？ 不確定是不是因為為了自己的演藝＂錢＂徒，好萊屋反宗教反信仰的潮流讓他有這樣的理解，這完全是自己猜想的，沒有任何的證據。
Ebola is now unreasonablely spreading in United States right now. I want to cry out where is the common sense to solve the problem? Why not stop the flight between west Africa and to the world? People are still want to put political correctness into the core issue. When I was perplex on how to explain the issue but now, thanks to Michael Moore, he gave me a vital example what's the political correctness at best. Here is his twitter yesterday....
If only the Liberian man w/ Ebola in Texas had told the hospital he wanted an abortion. They would have immediately gone all Pro-Life on him
— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) October 18, 2014
How about this? WOW I don't know if you are Pro-life, you will have better chance to get saved. 'Pro-life' sounds to blasphemously to me from Michael Moore! Dang! Those pro-lifers! Today, his wisecrack strikes again! This is even more classic, I mean, dang, you read on!
If u get sick in Texas, the last person u want treating u is a person educated in a system that says Adam & Eve rode dinosaurs 6,000 yrs ago
— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) October 18, 2014
As always, you need to get a closer look to those left wingers to see what they think and see how these folks have had influenced the world so far. Wouldn't their words reflects what they think and what they believe?
伊斯蘭國（Islamic State，之前被稱為Islamic State in Iraq
and Al-Sham--ISIS）近來的持續殘暴殺戮成為大眾的談論焦點，並成功的轉移伊斯蘭國政治運動下的真實目的，以至於對伊斯蘭國IS的看法只是一個比蓋達還邪惡的組織。根據這篇評論，伊斯蘭國IS極度可能會以內部擁有西方護照的外籍軍人，回國後策動恐怖攻擊－因此當下之急因當馬上將IS消滅；甚至，連沙烏地阿拉伯國王阿卜杜拉也提倡這樣的方法，當他說他確定這些聖戰士＂將會在一個月內抵達歐洲，在兩個月內抵達美國。[1]＂
在當前的階段，IS的專注於統治在伊拉克與敘利亞被征服的區域，並擴張其統治範圍至全國，以遜尼派多數的區域開始[7]；下一個的目標，將以征服周圍的穆斯林國家[8]。在第二期的Dabiq裡引用可靠的先知聖訓，它確實的定義伊斯蘭國此組織在建立國家上的優先順序－先是沙烏地阿拉伯，然後是伊朗，終極目標則是＂羅馬＂：[9]＂你將會入侵阿拉伯半島，阿拉會幫助你征服她；你將會入侵波斯，阿拉會幫助你征服她；你將會入侵羅馬，阿拉會幫助你征服她。然後，你會與韃渣（Dajjal，伊斯蘭的末日的仇敵，類同基督教裡的敵基督）爭戰，阿拉會幫助你征服他。＂[10]伊斯蘭國IS的發言人，Abu Muhammad Al-‘Adnani宣稱目前IS在巴格達迪--為哈里發的統治範圍將會擴張，＂從阿勒頗（Aleppo，敘利亞第一大城）至迪亞拉（伊拉克）＂開始[11]。
[2] In practice, the foundations for Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi's ideas on the establishment of the Islamic State were laid down by his predecessors, primarily Abu Mus'ab Al-Zarqawi, and IS spokesmen have acknowledged this ideological debt. It was Al-Zarqawi who promised "the establishment of an Islamic Emirate" during his lifetime. In an interview he gave, he outlined the stages his organization would follow in this "political enterprise": "First we will eliminate the enemy and establish the Islamic State, then we will burst out of [this state] to conquer the Muslim countries and restore Islam there, and [finally] we will fight the infidels." (Al-hesbah.org, December 7, 2006). The first issue of the IS's English-language magazine Dabiq also stated that Al-Zarqawi had paved the way towards the establishment of the Islamic state.
Under Al-Zarqawi's successors, Abu Hamza Al-Muhajir and Abu 'Omar Al-Baghdadi, the organization announced in October 2006 the establishment of the "Islamic State in Iraq" (ISI). Abu 'Omar was proclaimed "Amir al Muminin" (Commander of the Believers, the title of a sovereign Muslim ruler), and later other senior officials were named "ministers." However, despite calling itself a state and conferring appropriate titles on its leaders, the ISI did not "liberate" territories, nor did it establish government institutions. It functioned as a terror organization acting against the American occupation and later against (the predominantly Shi'ite) Iraqi regime.
Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, who succeeded Abu 'Omar Al-Baghdadi in May 2010, was more charismatic than Abu Hamza and Abu 'Omar, and also took the stage under circumstances that were much more favorable to the organization, as the American forces who had hobbled the organization's activity had either left or were on their way out, leaving behind them a vacuum and instability. This instability was further exacerbated by the Arab Spring, which touched off civil war in Syria. Furthermore, then-Iraqi prime minister Nouri Al-Maliki played into the organization's hands by his discriminatory and repressive policy towards the Sunnis and by his subservience to Iran. Yet another element was the propitiously timed waning of Al-Qaeda, which caused Islamists to expect a new savior.
In sum, the aspirations of the organization's four leaders were identical, but it was Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi who got the chance to realize this joint vision and had the forceful personality and charisma to carry it off.
[3] The second issue of Dabiq, which is called "The Flood," states on page 5: "It's either [establish] the Islamic State or [be wiped out by] the flood."
[4] It should be noted that in the rare cases where Al-Baghdadi refers to America in his speeches and threatens it, he puts it in the form of a reactive threat, that America should cease and desist from attacking Islam. See his January 2014 speech (Twitter.com/wa3tasimo, January 19, 2014) and his July 2012 speech where he said the IS would attack the U.S. "right away" (Shamikh1.info, July 22, 2012). More than two years of inaction have passed since he made that threat.
[6]Dabiq 2 states on page 4: "As for the massacres taking place in Gaza against the Muslim men, women and children, the Islamic State will do everything within its means to continue striking down every apostate who stands as an obstacle on its path towards Palestine. It is not the manner of the Islamic State to throw empty, dry and hypocritical words of condemnation and condolences like the Arab tawaghit [tyrants] do in the UN and the Arab League. Rather, its actions speak louder than its words, and it is only a matter of time before it reaches Palestine to fight the barbaric Jews and kill those of them hiding behind the gharqad trees – the trees of the Jews." Note that the magazine emphasized that at this stage, he is fighting the apostates who are keeping him from reaching Palestine (i.e., the Arab regimes, rather than Israel). Moreover, the reference to gharqad trees clearly places the confrontation with the Jews in the era of Judgment Day, according to the well-known hadith that says: "Judgment Day will not come until the Muslims fight the Jews and kill them. The Jews will hide behind stones and trees, and the stones and trees will call: O Muslim, o servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him - except for the gharqad tree, which is the tree of the Jews."
However, at other times the IS refers to Palestine as part of Al-Sham, to be liberated in the near future.
[7] After conquering Mosul in June 2014, the IS threatened that its next target would be Baghdad. However, it did not in fact advance towards the capital, but expanded instead into further Sunni-dominated regions.
[8] The Islamist State’s slogan is "dawlat al-islam baqiya" ("The State of Islam is Here to Stay"), stressing that it is eternal. This motto was apparently coined in April 17, 2007 by the organization's previous leader, Abu 'Omar Al-Baghdadi, and was adopted by Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi on June 15, 2013. On August 19, 2013 the latter expanded it to “dawlat al-islam baqiya watatamaddad” ("the Islamic State is Here to Stay and Will Expand"), as a further taunt to the organization's rivals, implying that the IS will spread beyond Iraq and Syria, where it currently operates.
[9] In the seventh century Islamic texts, "Rome" referred to the Christian Byzantine empire. In contemporary Islamist texts, it refers to Christendom in general.
[21] Al-Baghdadi also claims to share the Prophet's lineage when he calls himself Al-Qurayshi, a member of the Quraysh tribe, to which the Prophet belonged.
[22] This is exemplified by the Al-Medina Constitution of 622, which extended rights to the Jews to ensure their political absorption. These rights were subsequently withdrawn when Muhammad was able to expel them from the city in 628. Another example is the 628 Peace of Hudaibiya with the Meccans, which lasted 18 months, until the Prophet was able to realize his most cherished goal of taking over Mecca and the holy Ka'ba.
[23]Middleeastmonitor.com, September 3, 2014. Another historical example of a similar approach is Josef Stalin's doctrine that prioritized "Socialism in One Country" – as opposed to the vision of World Revolution advocated by Trotsky and Zinoviev. Stalin understood that the more he consolidated the Communist model and realized the principles of Socialism, as he understood them, in the territory under his control, the more influence the Soviet Union would gain. During WWII, in order to win the support of his American and British allies for his territorial demands, Stalin even dissolved the Comintern – the International Communist Movement, and also had Trotsky and Zinoviev, his opponents within the party, assassinated and executed respectively. His struggle against them is reminiscent of the internal war to the death being waged by the IS against its opponents within the global jihad movement.
[24] Some might object that the organization's brutal actions, such as the beheadings of journalists, cast doubt on the analysis presented here. If the IS wishes to consolidate its rule before taking on the West, why does it engage in brutal behavior against Westerners at the present stage? However, it should be noted that the two journalists who were recently beheaded were held captive by the IS for two years. Their execution was a response to the American bombings and constituted an attempt to achieve rudimentary deterrence. This clearly emerges from the videos released by the organization. As for the atrocities against Yazidis and the Al-Shaitat tribe, and the persecution of Christians, these conform to ancient Islamic doctrines with regards to idolaters, Christians, and apostates to which the Islamic State is committed – the same doctrines that provide the foundation for the postponement of a clash with the West.
[25] There were even those who hoped that Iran would take part in the effort. However, statements by Iranian officials soon dashed this hope. Addressing the International Conference Muslim Clergy, held September 10, 2014 in Tehran, Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, chairman of Iran’s Expediency Council, mocked the Sunni states' inability to confront the IS phenomenon, while stressing that Shi'ite Iran must remain uninvolved in this Sunni matter. IRNA (Iran), September 10, 2014.
以下是ISIS在敘利亞內最近的發展，最後一個蓋達組織分支被消滅，可以在一些主要的國際媒體上看到此消息。這裡的訊息來源來自Daniel Greenfield，Freedom Center的記者、獨立作家。 (另一個消息來源:long war journal)
ISIS在敘利亞境內面臨與在伊拉克境內不同的處境；其中之一為在敘利亞境內有另外兩個蓋達組織有不同的軍事行動。兩個蓋達組織，其一為Al Nusra前線，他們之前其實是來自ISIS的分支；在一段時間的戰鬥後，Al Nusra前線最後與ISIS合流。 ISIS最後一個對手則是Ahrar al Sham，原為伊斯蘭前線的核心團體，後來演變成蓋達的秘密行動組織。在ISIS自殺炸彈客炸死Abu Khalid al Suri之前，他是Ahrar al Sham的最高指令官，也是艾曼‧扎瓦希里（Ayman al-Zawahiri）在敘利亞內的人。 顯然的，目前的ISIS使用自殺炸彈客，一路的炸掉所有聖戰團體的領導人 ＂根據報導，一位自殺炸彈客在北敘利亞Idlib省的Ram Hamdan，接近一群這在此區域聚集的強硬派的伊斯蘭教派主義者的Ahrar al Sham領導人，觸動一台裝滿炸彈的汽車，殺死了至少28位領導人。死傷者，包括Hassan Abboud，叛軍的最高領導人。
圖片來源：FrontPage Mag
根據支持敘利亞叛軍的監督團體--敘利亞人權觀察（Syrian Observatory for Human Rights）發起人，Rami Abdul Rahman的說法，死亡人數會持續的增加。在沙烏地阿拉伯的Al Arabiya新聞頻道的面談中，Rahman說至少有50位’主要以及次級的領導人’在這一次Ram Hamdan的會面之中。 一月間，在沙烏地背後資助的伊斯蘭前線，其成員也包括Ahrar al Sham，參與在一個大型的軍事活動中，擊潰了忠於伊斯蘭國IS的軍事團體。在一個月之後，3個ISIS的自殺炸彈客暗殺了Ahrar al Sham其中之一的創立元老，蓋達組織的行動高層，Abu Khaled Suri。 ＂ 在一方面這是好消息，然而另一層面來看，ISIS正在強迫網羅所有的賽萊菲團體（同受伊斯蘭原教旨主義影響的聖戰團體），特別是那些掌控蓋達組織的老兵；另外，他們也想藉此對歐巴馬政府傳達他們不會因著空襲就停止擴張的決心。IS明白歐巴馬尋求沙烏地與卡達的獻策，就是藉著聯合與支持較溫和的聖戰團體來壓制IS，因此IS就藉著消滅所有不與他們合流的聖戰團體，來確保沒有任何ISIS的敵人。
事實就是，波士尼亞穆斯林所組成在Handzar分隊的武裝親衛隊（Handzar SS Division）就是讓波士尼亞的猶太人與塞爾維亞社群被消滅、屠殺的兇手，並且負責轉送並消滅奧斯威辛集中營的倖存者；然而，正是這位穆夫提，胡希尼，為這些可怕罪行直接的推手所做出可憎的行動；這件事與胡希尼在戰時窮凶惡極的活動來比較，對他在阻止想要離開歐洲移民至巴勒斯坦猶太人的打擊還是有限。胡希尼乞求從納粹高層艾希曼[2]與希姆萊[3]的支持，殘酷的霸凌德國、羅馬尼亞與匈牙利官方，直接造成取消估計約48萬張[4]發給猶太人的離境簽證，這樣的結果直接導致這群無助的人們被送往納粹的集中營之中。
